How is a statistically significant result interpreted?

Prepare for the Pearson Revel Test with multiple-choice questions and detailed explanations. Ace your exam with confidence!

Multiple Choice

How is a statistically significant result interpreted?

Statistical significance is about evidence against the idea that the observed effect is just due to random variation. When you set a threshold before testing (the alpha level, like 0.05), a result is considered statistically significant if the data would be unlikely under the null hypothesis—specifically, the probability of seeing data as extreme as what you observed is less than or equal to that alpha. In other words, the observed effect is unlikely to be due to chance, given the chosen alpha level. This interpretation doesn’t claim absolute truth or practical importance. It’s a probabilistic statement about evidence against the null hypothesis. It also doesn’t guarantee a meaningful or large effect, and the p-value depends on sample size and variability. Why the other ideas aren’t right: the claim of confirming beyond doubt isn’t how statistics works—significance is about probability, not certainty. The statement that the p-value is always less than 0.05 isn’t true, since alpha can be set to other values. The idea that the sample size guarantees a meaningful result ignores that small effects can become statistically significant in large samples, and large effects can be non-significant in small samples if variability is high.

Statistical significance is about evidence against the idea that the observed effect is just due to random variation. When you set a threshold before testing (the alpha level, like 0.05), a result is considered statistically significant if the data would be unlikely under the null hypothesis—specifically, the probability of seeing data as extreme as what you observed is less than or equal to that alpha. In other words, the observed effect is unlikely to be due to chance, given the chosen alpha level.

This interpretation doesn’t claim absolute truth or practical importance. It’s a probabilistic statement about evidence against the null hypothesis. It also doesn’t guarantee a meaningful or large effect, and the p-value depends on sample size and variability.

Why the other ideas aren’t right: the claim of confirming beyond doubt isn’t how statistics works—significance is about probability, not certainty. The statement that the p-value is always less than 0.05 isn’t true, since alpha can be set to other values. The idea that the sample size guarantees a meaningful result ignores that small effects can become statistically significant in large samples, and large effects can be non-significant in small samples if variability is high.

More practice questions